The Daily Gambit #2: The Englund (The "Call an Ambulance" Opening)
Yesterday, we looked at how to commit a crime with White. Today, we’re playing Black, and we’re going to be even more disrespectful.THE GAMBIT GUY IS MOVING! FOLLOW THE DAILY SERIES ON CHESS.COM: TheGambitGuyOfficial
(SORRY FOR THE DELAY GUYS INTERNET PROBLEMS)
Okay, first things first: YOU GUYS ARE LEGENDS. I woke up to 10+ hearts on the Jerome Gambit post and my notifications are blowing up. I called myself a "super-prodigy" as a joke (though I actually am lol), but you guys are the ones that are super here! Thank you so much!
Moving on, if you’re tired of 1. d4 players trying to bore you into a 60-move grind, the Englund Gambit is your 'flip off' to theory. We aren't here for a draw; we’re here to go home early.
Enter: Fritz Englund. He was a Swedish master who looked at the most solid opening in chess history and thought, "What if I just... didn't?" He’s the reason why, 100 years later, keyboard-smashing is at an all-time high.
Disclaimer: I’m actually a 1. d4 player myself. So if you use this against me and I fall for it, I’m deleting this blog.
The Setup (Free Real Estate?)
It starts with the ultimate Noob move:
For the 1. d4 player, this is confusing. We’re used to the Slav, the Nimzo-Indian, or the Queen’s Gambit. We’re used to people respecting our space. Then suddenly, Black just... gives us a pawn? Black is literally giving a pawn away for free on move one. The engine immediately screams at you. Most 1. d4 players will take it with a smug smile, thinking they’ve already won. They haven't.
Now, look at the board. Black has a Knight out, a Queen out, and they are begging for their pawn back. This is where the Psychological Trap begins. White thinks: "I'm a 1. d4 player. I am solid. I will defend this pawn until the heat death of the universe."
The "Bullet Cheat Code" (Moves to Glory)
Here is the following sequence that has caused more keyboard-smashing than any other opening in history:
Reality Check
Is this opening good? Absolutely not. If White has a pulse (and more than 10 seconds on their clock), they will play 4. Nc3! and Black is just... down a pawn for no reason. But that’s not why we’re here. We’re here for the 1-minute Bullet games. We’re here for the opponents who are playing on autopilot. The Englund isn't about the engine eval (which is around -1.6 for Black); it’s about the "What just happened?" factor.
My Professional Opinion
As a 1. d4 player, I officially hate this opening—and that is exactly why it works. The Englund is the "anti-chess" opening. While 1. d4 players are busy dreaming of 30-move strategic masterpieces, Black is trying to end the game in 8 moves.
Objectively? It’s a "hope chess" opening. You are hoping White hasn't had their coffee yet. But in the world of online Blitz and Bullet, "hope" is a very powerful strategy. It forces White to find unique, precise moves (like 4. Nc3!) while Black just follows a pre-set script.
Advice for the Bold
The "Double Trap": If White defends the c2-pawn with 6. Nc3, don't panic. You can still play 6... Bb4. Even if they play perfectly, you’ve dragged a 1. d4 player into a tactical mud-fight by move 6. That’s a win in itself.
When to Bail: If your opponent plays 4. Nc3 instead of 4. Bf4, stop hunting the Queen. Pivot immediately into a "Scandi-style" game. You're down a pawn, but you have activity.
Know your Audience: Play this against London System players. They are usually the ones most "offended" by aggressive early pawn sacrifices.
Accuracy: 1.5/10 (Stockfish is actually calling the police)
Fun: 11/10 (The feeling of mating a 1. d4 player on move 8 is better than winning the World Championship)
Respectability: 0/10 (Your opponent will already block you)
Here is an example game of when the Englund was played. This was in the 73rd Moscow Blitz, and the players were: Daniil Dubov (white) versus Saveliy Gobulov. They did play a few moves of the Englund, but instead of just eight moves, it lasted 49 moves, ending with a threefold repetition draw. Check it out below!
Note: This game was played in real time (and life), this wasn't staged.
The Verdict
The Englund is the ultimate 'Liar’s Gambit.' You are betting that your opponent’s ego is bigger than their opening knowledge. If you are playing a GM in a classical tournament? Never touch this. If you are playing a 1-minute Bullet game on Lichess at 3:00 AM? It’s the best opening in the world. It’s fast, it’s mean, and even if you lose, the game was only 10 moves long—you can just start another one!
On a scale of 1 to 10, how fast would you resign if you blundered your Queen like this? Let me know in the comments, and let’s see if we can hit another 10 hearts!
