Rule change idea for healthier chess

The idea came to me after thinking about videogames, and how competitive players gain advantage by exploiting bugs.

Here it is:
In a position like this, where white can't move, it shouldn't be a draw. White would be able to move the king, get captured, and lose the game. Why? Take a look at the next position.

The white player is losing. Knowing about the stalemate rule, it looks for a way to get the draw, and moves the rook to c5 on purpose. You've seen this nifty move in the past.

Now tell me, is this a strategy within the rules of chess? Does it feel fair to escape from a completely lost position, not by cleverly combining your pieces, but by using the rule as a strategy? Is it an immoral way of abiding by the law? What if you were black? Black would still be winning if it wasn't for that rule. Also, who likes going against someone that plays for the draw?

I think the stalemate rule was an attempt to put a solution to unclear positions; now it's time to revise it. And don't get me started with triple repetition cases.