Comments on https://lichess.org/@/felew699/blog/against-stockfish-game-12-a-system-change/WF6ruCsU
I've followed this series with great interest and read most of the posts in one sitting. I'm interested in discovering how I can incorporate stylistic elements of computer play into my game.
Your pawn sacrifice in, I believe, game 10 was a prime example of this. I believe your experiment is the way forward to ushering in the largest stylistic shift in chess since hypermodernism.
It irks me when I hear the suited analysts commentating the large tournaments scoff, "This is not a human move, so discount it, you can't fault the player for not finding it." Maybe so, but those who incorporate computer style play will find themselves grappling with confused opponents. This makes me think of the Viih Sou debacle, or Jiu Jitsu.
How do we incorporate this "computer style" into our play as humans? I'm looking for those patterns in your games, and am keen to understand the thinking systems (Super Eval!!?!) that can reproduce them without the drain of immense calculation. Thanks again!
I've followed this series with great interest and read most of the posts in one sitting. I'm interested in discovering how I can incorporate stylistic elements of computer play into my game.
Your pawn sacrifice in, I believe, game 10 was a prime example of this. I believe your experiment is the way forward to ushering in the largest stylistic shift in chess since hypermodernism.
It irks me when I hear the suited analysts commentating the large tournaments scoff, "This is not a human move, so discount it, you can't fault the player for not finding it." Maybe so, but those who incorporate computer style play will find themselves grappling with confused opponents. This makes me think of the Viih Sou debacle, or Jiu Jitsu.
How do we incorporate this "computer style" into our play as humans? I'm looking for those patterns in your games, and am keen to understand the thinking systems (Super Eval!!?!) that can reproduce them without the drain of immense calculation. Thanks again!

