Comments on https://lichess.org/@/matstc/blog/exploring-the-narrative-arcs-of-chess-games/gAInESOs
looks interesting but needs sign in to run
also this might be out of your scope but i am curious to see this graphs arising from playing white or black, with a sort of general mirroring of opponents graphs to see which of our moves induce eval changes for both sides, if that makes sense
looks interesting but needs sign in to run
also this might be out of your scope but i am curious to see this graphs arising from playing white or black, with a sort of general mirroring of opponents graphs to see which of our moves induce eval changes for both sides, if that makes sense
@g6firste6second said in #2:
looks interesting but needs sign in to run
also this might be out of your scope but i am curious to see this graphs arising from playing white or black, with a sort of general mirroring of opponents graphs to see which of our moves induce eval changes for both sides, if that makes sense
Yes! Running the analysis per color could be interesting. I added that ability to the notebook.

As for the mirroring, I don't fully understand that part... the eval is already taking both sides into account (?)
@g6firste6second said in #2:
> looks interesting but needs sign in to run
> also this might be out of your scope but i am curious to see this graphs arising from playing white or black, with a sort of general mirroring of opponents graphs to see which of our moves induce eval changes for both sides, if that makes sense
Yes! Running the analysis per color could be interesting. I added that ability to the notebook.

As for the mirroring, I don't fully understand that part... the eval is already taking both sides into account (?)
@matstc said in #3:
As for the mirroring, I don't fully understand that part... the eval is already taking both sides into account (?)
what i meant by that is if we could use our graphs as a benchmark to compare with the eval graph of any single game we had played, as an overlay
@matstc said in #3:
> As for the mirroring, I don't fully understand that part... the eval is already taking both sides into account (?)
what i meant by that is if we could use our graphs as a benchmark to compare with the eval graph of any single game we had played, as an overlay
@g6firste6second said in #4:
As for the mirroring, I don't fully understand that part... the eval is already taking both sides into account (?)
what i meant by that is if we could use our graphs as a benchmark to compare with the eval graph of any single game we had played, as an overlay
Right, makes sense. I added a cell at the bottom of the notebook where people can plot whatever games they want. It does not do analysis but just plots the resampled games on top of each other.
@g6firste6second said in #4:
> > As for the mirroring, I don't fully understand that part... the eval is already taking both sides into account (?)
>
> what i meant by that is if we could use our graphs as a benchmark to compare with the eval graph of any single game we had played, as an overlay
Right, makes sense. I added a cell at the bottom of the notebook where people can plot whatever games they want. It does not do analysis but just plots the resampled games on top of each other.
