The Deepest Moves of All Time

I don't like the AI images; it is very disturbing for me. Great writing. Thank you.

I like the 3rd one but it's not the most accurate. First 1.Bd5!! (threatening Re8#) and only after Rxd5 does 2.Qc7 work.
Not to hate but, it's the more accurate way. Still pretty cool.

@A_Chess_King_Player said in #7:

I have a question. How do you see brilliant moves on Lichess.org, because it only shows you inaccuracies, mistakes and blunders.

You cant. But you can judge on your own, and you are free to put "!!" on any move you want in your analysis.

IČPKFI8RFČP9OR9F

@theScot said in #9:

I have a question. How do you see brilliant moves on Lichess.org, because it only shows you inaccuracies, mistakes and blunders.

I don't think you see them in the same way as on chess.com. It's more like it's the only move that accomplishes the aim, in a creative non-intuitive way.

Thank you

@nathoulou35 said in #14:

I have a question. How do you see brilliant moves on Lichess.org, because it only shows you inaccuracies, mistakes and blunders.

You cant. But you can judge on your own, and you are free to put "!!" on any move you want in your analysis.

Thank you

Thi is ablogs for 5

@A_Chess_King_Player said ^

I have a question. How do you see brilliant moves on Lichess.org, because it only shows you inaccuracies, mistakes and blunders.

A computer doesn't have a category ”brilliancy“. That's a human concept. A ”good“ move for a computer is any move that doesn't make the evaluation of a position worse. So a computer can – by itself – only point out mistakes.